Cinema*观文读影

You are currently browsing the archive for the Cinema*观文读影 category.

One of the less brilliant Hugh Grant movies (of which there are numerous), featuring memorable dialogues such as the following:

Woman: Your skin is so white. I want to be white too. But it's not possible, is it?

Hugh Grant: Maybe with some powder?

The character, an English engineer trapped in India, is possibly the least suitable role for the posh Hugh Grant. He is brilliant as Edward Ferrars in Sense and Sensibility, Clive Durham in Maurice, William Thacker in Notting Hill and even Daniel Cleaver in Bridget Jones' Diary.

English nobleman and licentious skirt-chaser bring the best out of Hugh Grant. He should never appear in dirty basketball shirt out of city slums, nor inelegantly walking on a dirt road with pants obviously too short for him.

Equally discrepant is the plot. There is a crazy journalist character, and many times you are left clueless as to what a particular scene is trying to convey. In all, it is only for the sake of HG do one endure such a disastrous movie.

Can't-miss funny video of HG's earlier endeavors.

But Maurice is the complete opposite. Only 27 years old (though he looked as if he's 20), Hugh Grant plays a rich student at an English private school in the early 1910s. Candle lite dinners, canoeing on river while talking about "the whole Western culture is based on the law of Christ, not Plato" and beautifully lying on green grass with his lover are the scenes that naturally bring home the charm of the Hugh Grant.

A minor note: like a blossoming flower, Hugh Grant's features transitioned from the dark hair and dark eyes in Maurice while in his late twenties to the sandy hair and blue eyes in Notting Hill in his late thirties (when his charm peaked).

Music and Lyrics (2007), Love Actually (2003), About a Boy (2002), Bridget Jone's Diary (2001), Extreme Measures (1996 – stay away from action movies, Hugh), Four Weddings and a Funeral (1994) are…ah, your regular romantic comedy, with varying degrees of mediocrity.

But the thing is, Hugh Grant himself was never buried beneath whatever role he's playing. We see a little, or maybe a lot, of Hugh Grant in the characters he plays. The juror's verdict is: the reluctant actor should retire to writing. Did You Hear About the Morgans should be his last movie. Otherwise, he risks the danger he so fears himself: becoming worse and worse by each film and fade out with no dignity.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

An Englishman's Travels in America: his observations of life and manners in the free and slave states was written by John Benwell in 1857, four years before the civil war.

I always find it critical to know a book's author in order to understand his writing. But there is hardly any information on the Internet about John Benwell, an obscure writer, it seems.

It was riveting reading nevertheless. Mr. Benwell, being this perfect English gentleman, examined the people, cities and towns of America along his travels from New York down to Florida and South Carolina with an almost indiscernible supremacy. Especially in New York City, Mr. Benwell frequently made comparisons to his home country, or America's "mother country," on either the qualities of hotels or the appearances of the ladies.

But down South to the slave states, the author's observations became much less lighthearted. Mr. Benwell was first forced to leave a theater box belonging to a colored friend who married a white woman (the woman being ostracized). He witnessed the constant whipping and torturing of slaves, which made him indignant. In Florida, there's open war between the settlers and the Indians. One of his friends was cruelly murdered by Indians. The South described by Mr. Benwell is certainly a different world from that of Ms. Scarlett O'Hara.

The author expected the population changes, in that blacks would outnumber their masters in some states, could lead to a resolution of the conflict. Of course, it was the civil war that took care of slavery. By that time, our honest observer was probably in England, recovering from a rough journey in a country that cost his health, and almost his life. Here are some excerpts:

Their habits at table also often fill one with disgust, and the want of good-breeding I witnessed on more than one occasion would have been resented in England. This is the more remarkable, as the Americans entertain high notions of refinement, and yet, paradoxical as it may appear, seem to glory in their contempt of good manners. I do not, however, include the ladies in this remark;

(men chewing tobacco)..incessantly, and, to the great annoyance of those who do not practise the vandalism, eject the impregnated saliva over everything under foot. The deck of the vessel was much defaced by the noxious stains; and even in converse with ladies the unmannerly fellows expectorated without sense of decency.

…..determined opposition to intermixed marriages, were known in the place as "anti-amalgamists." On this occasion poor P—- nearly lost his life, and, but for running, would, no doubt, have done so; as it was, he was much burnt about the head and neck, the ruffians in the scuffle having set fire to his frock-coat, which was of linen.

Their healthy look under such circumstances completely shook my faith in the Brahminical vegetarian theory, and goes far, I think, to prove that man was intended by his Maker to be a carnivorous animal.

for so jealous are the citizens of men entertaining hostility to the pro-slavery cause, that spies are often sent on board newly-arrived boats, to ascertain if missionaries are amongst the passengers. These spies, with Jesuitical art, introduce themselves by making apparently casual inquiries on leading topics of those they suspect, and if their end is subserved, basely betray them, or, what is more usual, keep them under strict surveillance, with a view to their being detected in disseminating abolition doctrines amongst the slaves, when they are immediately made amenable to the laws, and are fined or

(in describing Florida) This country is, for the most part, a howling wilderness, and is never likely to become thickly populated. The dreary pine-barrens and sand-hills are slightly undulating, and are here and there thickly matted with palmetto.

every one of which swarmed with alligators. This, although not a very pleasant reflection, did not trouble me much, as I had by this time become acquainted with the propensities of these creatures, and knew that they were not given to attacking white men, unless provoked or wounded, although a negro or a dog is never safe within their reach. They are, however, repulsive-looking creatures, and it is not easy to divest the mind of apprehension when in their vicinity.

At the top of King-street, facing you as you advance, is a large Protestant episcopal church. I went there to worship on the following Sunday, but was obliged to leave the building, there being, it was stated by the apparitor, no accommodation for strangers, a piece of illiberality that I considered very much in keeping with the slave-holding opinions of the worshippers who attend it.

This want of politeness I was not, however, surprised at, for it is notorious, as has been before observed by an able writer, that, excepting the Church of Rome, "the members of the unestablished Church of England–the Protestant Episcopalian, are the most bigotted, sectarian, and illiberal, in the United States of America. Being fully persuaded," to follow the same writer, "that prelatical ordination and the three orders are indispensable to their profession, they are, like too many of their fellow professors in the mother country, deeply dyed with Laudean principles, or that love of formula in religion and grasping for power which has so conspicuously shown itself among the Oxford tractarians, and which, it is to be feared, is gradually undermining Protestant conformity, by gnawing at its very heart, in the colleges of Great Britain."

So heinous in a negro, is the crime of lifting his hand in opposition to a white man in South Carolina, that the law adjudges that the offending member shall be forfeited. This is, or was, quite as inexorable as the one I have before spoken of, and when in Charleston, I frequently, amongst the flocks of negroes passing and repassing, saw individuals with one hand only. Like the administration of miscalled justice on negroes in all slave-holding states in America, the process was summary; the offender was arrested, brought before the bench of sitting magistrates, and on the ex parte[A] statement of his accuser, condemned to mutilation, being at once marched out to the rear of the building and the hand lopped off on a block fixed there for the purpose. I noticed a block and axe myself in the yard of a building near the town-hall, and on looking at them closely, saw they were stained almost black, with what I have little hesitation in saying was human blood.

Tags: , ,

Notting Hill

Tags: ,

2003年,车行在多伦多的乡间马路上,我聆听着一位加拿大朋友对人种的看法。我们刚刚路过一片印第安人保留地。“黑人印第安人就是低等人种,要不是白人给他们带来了文明,他们到现在还只会吃野果,打猎为生。”

2006年,从哥伦比亚小镇到堪萨斯城的路上,我与同学探讨同一个话题:在全球化之前,世界文明为什么会有不同程度的发展?为什么有的地方出现了高度文明的社会,而有的却似乎永远处于原始阶段?他说,你应该看一本书:Guns, Germs, and Steel。会给你答案。

当这本书不经意的出现在我手边的时候,我其实已经归纳出了一个解答。美国社会等级分化与种族的关联似乎表示,即使不同种族的人们拥有相似的环境和机会,总体上,白人系统性的取得超出黑人的成就。这意味着有的种族--从基因上--是优于其他人种的。

当然,我只是偷偷的持批判态度的这么想。说出这样的话是要引起公愤的。有一次,与朋友交谈时我试探的表示这是否是一种可能的解释。她低声说,我是这么认为的,但别告诉别人!

这本书让我的想法发生了彻底的改变。观察周围的人们,把原因归结到基因上是一个太容易犯的错误。曾有报道称社会学家们做过试验,将黑人和白人小孩放置在相似家庭和社会环境下,若干年后白人小孩在学习成绩等指标上均超过黑人小孩。许多人觉得黑人就是那种擅长体育音乐而智力低下的人。人们说非洲的黑人即使有钱也不赚,永远的懒惰,不求上进。

但这只是一种肤浅的分析,而忽略了根本的原因。这本书其实可以用一句话概括:与人们常常误解的人种优劣决定文明程度的解释相反,文明程度从根本上是由环境所定。在哥伦布之前,北美,澳大利亚,新西兰等大陆或海岛无法与外界接触。在某些大陆内部也被沙漠高山等分割成块,相互无法接触,使得文明无法在碰撞中升华。另外,有的地区因气候地理植被等原因,如部分澳大利亚洲,不适合人们发展农耕,固定居所,再而形成城市,产生复杂的社会结构。这些地区的人们有史以来就不得不一直过游猎生活。因此没有机会发展语言等。

而欧亚大陆具有得天独厚的优势。不但板块最大,而且基本可以由陆路水路到达许多不同的区域。由于气候好,适合农耕,因此形成人口聚集的点,这样便促使语言,商业的发展。因为社会结构复杂,因而又催生了法律,政府,文学,音乐等等。在历史的长河中,几大文明中心在碰撞,竞争和融合中更加推进了社会的进步。

其实,这本书的意思也可以用一句老话概括:一方水土养一方人。这个“方”字用的好,小至一山一河,大至五大洲,都是水土决定了居住在那里的人们的性格和文明。你看,穷山恶水出刁民,多么简洁。Jared Diamond的一本大书包含的道理正和我们老祖宗的结论遥相呼应啊。

Tags: , , , ,

一部很好看的电影, 以Edith Wharton的同名小说改编。很精致的再现了纽约20世纪初的贵族生活,完全欧洲贵族的翻版。因为是翻版,所以格外小心些,一切都要比欧洲更严谨。绅士们要更绅士;礼仪要更规矩;家族血统和名誉要更加倍捍卫。许多镜头让人眩晕的迷恋。我们的时代已经没了优雅。

c

f

b

d

44

a

那一点头,那一伸手,那圆舞曲,那如孔雀般的礼服,怎么能不让人着迷呢?看罢让人恨不得立刻乘时间隧道回到那个年代。可是,一个中国人?那毕竟不是我们的文化,我们的过去。就算回去了,岂不是要去西部修铁路?

于是想到红楼梦:那是我们先辈贵族们的生活。看看中国贵族的生活,87版红楼梦。

h

i

j

xin_43208032311106256511138

kl

m

反差是多么的巨大。那Anglo Saxon Christian white 和 Chinese Confucianism red。中国贵族一家人讲究热热闹闹在一起,就算先正经作个揖,马上大家又团在一起,推推搡搡说笑。没有西方那样很cool的一抬帽檐,很cool的一点头;小姐们于是高傲的抬起自己美丽的脸盘,将手搭在男士已经伸出在半空的手上,然后两人开始优美的旋转。

社交,特别是男女青年社交,在传统中国从来没有产生过。中国贵族小姐与少爷的婚姻都是家长做主。常说:男女授授不亲吗。还社什么交。但西方不知为什么,产生了社交这个重要的现象,并衍生了一系列社交的迷人礼仪。social life. 在中国来讲,也许只存在family life吧。

a

b

然后20世纪初西方来了,东方因此再也不同了。格格服变成了旗袍,中国男女也跳起交谊舞了。一个世纪后,交谊舞成了退休老人在公园里穿着睡裤做的运动了。你看,人是多么善于变化啊。

Tags: , , , ,

Thought the movie had a familiar feel to it – googled it and found it is directed by the same director of The Gladiator, Ridley Scott. Balian is just like the gladiator: unfailing, loyal and a man with few words but unmeasurable wisdom. In all, a perfect man.

Despite its name and subject, the movie does not delve into the topic of religion. In Balian's speech before the defense of Jerusalem, he resorted back to "fight for freedom." Alas, one would hope a little authenticity in spirit to accompany the realistic costumes and stage set. It is almost as if the story is chosen for its opportunity to create impressive scenes. To conclude: a beautiful movie with a mundane soul. Score: 80.

2005_kingdom_of_heaven_wallpaper_003

bielik01_KingdomHeaven

kingdomofheavenpubqkingdom5

Kingdom of Heaven DVD Movie Reviewheaven4

Tags: , , ,

Great movies…from one from ten, these two are ten – perfect films. I love them – love them!

Annex - Heston, Charlton (Ben-Hur)_06

article-0-00D0A0FB00000578-784_468x286

ben-hur-41

moses-charltonhestonTenCommandments_07ten-commandmentsthe-ten-commandments-pics

Tags: ,

Peter Peterson, the former camera maker Bell & Howell CEO, former commerce secretary, former chairman of Lehman Brothers, and founder of private equity giant Blackstone, wrote a book: The Education of An American Dreamer.

I've read several biographies of "successful" people. Have to say, this one is making the reading experience pretty boring. The so-called successful people seem to be a bunch of self-righteous and uncreative individuals – at least the ones I've read. They were never wrong. They were never selfish or greedy – others were. Even if they committed mistake, it's because they were naive and too trusting. How about some true-to-nature biographies like Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Confessions?

Just one example of this book's self-righteousness. When describing the fight between Lew Glucksman and himself, Mr. Peterson described how greedy and adamant Glucksman was in the fight, but never acknowledged that the fight represents a deeper cultural divide between the bankers and the traders at the firm. Traders, despite pulling in the majority of the firm's profit (we learned these profits were illusionary soon enough), were distributed smaller share of the firm's bonuses. Bankers' importance in the form's bottom line has declined significantly, but was not reflected in how bonuses were divided. Mr. Peterson wrote the episode as if it's a fight between the good (himself of course) and the evil.

Another example: when defending himself in Blackstone's IPO in 2007, Mr. Peterson says he didn't see the market's peak at all. You have to wonder, for someone who consistently make the right call on market directions and opportunities, how come he would not do the same this time? We are not asking him to confess that he intentional cashed out his investment at shareholders' expense, but to say that he did not know that them market is frothy and overleveraged is just plainly annoying.

Some more of these kind of biographies will force me to designate this category of books as unreadible. I already seriously doubt whether the kind of success – being CEO of a big company or being "the big shot" – is meaningful. If such success produces hypocrites, maybe it's worthwhile to stay real and be a failure.

Excerpts:

Page 288: Blackstone's $500 million purchase of 51 percent of Transtar, our name for the new spun-off company, was announced in the financial  press on June 21, 1988.

The structure of the Transtar deal bears looking at. It helps explain what is a mystery to many and a reason to criticize for some. The uestion is how private equity firms liks Blackstone make money. Critics say,"you don't make anything. Why shoud you be so highly paid?" But we do make something. We make opportunities for businesses to grow and change, which creates more opportunities all up and down the line. At the same time,, I would certainly admit some investments are far more difficult than others. Transtar was not one of them.

Here's how it worked in the case of Transtar, which turned out to be an extradinary investment, made possible  by the characteristics of Transtar as a company and the benign financial conditions that existed during our period of ownership.

Its cash flows were solid and steady, owing to many long-term contracts. The equipment was relatively new and well maintained so that little new capital would be required, and depreciation was high. All this made it possible to buy Transtar in a highly leveraged deal, meaning much of the purchase price was borrowed, 95 percent, in fact. And because we were willing to be flexible and creative about overseeing and operating the new company, we got it at an excellent price.

The equity put into the deal totaled only $25 million, or 5 percent of the purchase price. Of that, 51 percent was Blackstone's – $13,421,000. The remaining 49 percent investment came from USX. With the solid cash flows, large in relation to the business, we were able to benefit from a virtually assured ad steady flow of divident payments as well as recapitalizations and other realized proceeds while at the same time paying off the loans.

…in 1999, twelve years after the original purchase, when we sold the part of the business that we had retained, we realized proceeds totaling $344,601,000 and our annual return on our investment was a stunning 129.9 percent, or 26 tiimes our original investment. Blackstone's carried interest gains, as they are termed, amounted to something over $60 million.

Tags: , , ,

每个人都有一个故事,但只有极少数人的故事得以被讲述。在中国千千万万的家庭和企业变迁中,成都420厂和其工人们是幸运的。如果没有贾樟柯的电影,他们的故事也会同样随着大大的“拆”字流散于风中了。贾据说采访了90余名工人,可电影里我们只窥视到9个人故事的一角。世界上大多数的人,都消逝的太快,太早,毫无痕迹。那这152分钟对于420厂已是幸甚,于我们的时代已是幸甚。

Tags:

站台

賈樟柯的《站台》听说了许久都没有看。大学时的一门课上曾看过他的《小武》,记得他横空出世式般的另类与让人手足无措的真实。前段时间在网上看了《三峡好人》,而今晚的《站台》又是如此 - 賈樟柯还从没让人失望过。

好的电影能够穿越时空。这是八十年代中晚期山西省的小城镇,改革开放初期的点滴变化被细腻而又真实的再现,从穿喇叭裤到墙上新用白粉刷出的“旅馆淋 浴洗澡”的字样;从文工团到深圳霹雳歌舞公司; 从“火车向着韶山跑”到“我的中国心”到“站台”(摇滚版);从张军短暂的广州之旅到钟萍离家闯荡;崔明亮家里有了黑白电视,他父亲开了五金器材店,邻居买了洗衣机,播放性教育片的录像厅,迪斯科晚会 -改变就这样不惊不乍的上演,没有价值判断,没有意识形态,有的是人人都能理解的梦想,青春,衬着浓浓的时代背景色。

故事开始就是火车,又不断的出现“站台”这首歌,贾一定有自己的初衷和寓意。可看电影不是解迷也不是一道小学时的语文题,每个人都可以用自己的方式 来解读。我想到的是一种孤寂的感觉,那种在一个小小站台上等待火车的茫然。虽然从来没有真的在那样的站台上等待过 - 那种四周被山包围,空无一人,只有一个简单的白色水泥牌,上面黑字写着“云岭乡” - 可那种感觉很熟悉。坐火车时经常会路过这样的车站,常常想像什么样的人经历了怎样的离别走了多远的山路,才来到这样的站台,然后在长椅上坐下,行李放在脚 边,离别的思念已经开始,对未来的期待仍然不知所措 - 这是《站台》整个故事的情绪,是每个人物的感情,是那个时代的气氛。

最让人感动的一幕是这群年轻人在荒野上奔向一列驶来的火车,这火车可以包含任何寓意,或者也可以只是火车 - 一样他们虽然在舞台上表演过无数遍,却从来没有亲眼见过的东西,但他们奔跑的激情和望着火车远去的茫然,就这样将飞扬的青春定格。如张爱玲所说:人生的精 彩就在那撒把的一瞬间吧。

如果说整个故事充满了青春的青涩和激越,那么最后一个镜头却显得如此冷酷。崔明亮和尹瑞娟经过含蓄而又曲折的 过程终于结婚生子。他们在城墙上不远不近的羞涩闲聊已经变成不可回想的历史。尹抱着小孩逗他玩灶上烧的开水,她看起来是知足的幸福的,完全遗忘自己曾考过 省上的艺校,曾深夜里随着收音机里的音乐起舞,曾做着远大的梦。而旁边崔深陷在椅子里,夹着烟的手遮着脸,仿佛不敢相信自身的处境,对尹和孩子发出的笑声毫无反应。他也许想起了自己对未来 的设想,那或许包括尹和他们的孩子,但决不是现在这样的生活。在门外灰白的天空里仿佛可以看到钟萍寻梦的足迹,她是四人里面唯一与过去决裂,只身出走为梦想打 拼的人。穿着大红西班牙女郎裙,奔放踢踏的她注定命运比别人更坎坷,与生活的妥协也更艰难。

说到底,从站台离开的人总有一天要再回来 -手提着破碎的梦想,脸上书写着沧桑。

Tags: , ,

« Older entries